Citation Hunt

The Wikipedia snippet below is not backed by a reliable source. Can you find one?

Click I got this! to go to Wikipedia and fix the snippet, or Next! to see another one. Good luck!

In page Hansen, Schrader & Co. v De Gasperi:

"

In determining the common intention of the parties, then, the courts must consider first the literal and ordinary meaning of the words in the contract.[6][7] Hence Innes J continues, in Joubert v Enslin, "If the contract itself, or any evidence admissible under the circumstances, affords a definite indication of the meaning of the contracting parties, then it seems to me that a court should always give effect to that meaning."[8]